Comments for Response to Jesus is Love

Comments for "Response to: Jesus is Love..."

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

smb March 20, 2009 at 2:13 pm

That would be something like distorting "John the Baptist" to mean "Jesus"…

Reply

GeorgeRic October 17, 2009 at 4:08 am

A hundred and sixty-six years ago Edwin Abbott wrote 'Flatland ' so that any logical person would understand that contiguous dimensional worlds allows any thinking person to geometrically know how Christianity's' spiritual world could be right beside ours. Now 'Techie Worlds' examines Christian phenomena: Trinity, Resurrection, Judgment, Soul, and finds that Abbott's concept provides mechanistically for those phenomena. This is the approach science uses: establish understandings of the real world by testing facts in the context of the theory. With such logical understandings, thinking people can accept Christianity's teaching of love without bending their intellectual integrity. 'Techie Worlds' gives pause to Moslems and pagans by showing how and why the Trinity is. It explains realities that profit all mankind.
'Techie Worlds' is available at amazon.com.
GeorgeRic

Reply

GuyveroZ May 18, 2010 at 7:47 am

Hi I'm new here and my first time reading this article and I justwanted to point out the line says

John 3:36 (NRSV)

“Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever DISOBEYS the Son will not see life, but must endure God’s wrath.”

It just says whoever disobeys will endure God's wrath so I sak you… What if you follow said teaching but don't believe?
You are never given provisions for that.

Reply

Herby Sagues December 7, 2010 at 9:49 pm

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.”

I would still not trust a guy that impregnated his own mother (and his daughter as well).

Reply

Leave a Comment