Meanwhile, of course, religions are fascinating in the insights they provide into human psychology and are well worth studying for that reason alone. I am sure you are familiar with the term "intellectual curiosity".

New Testament=God's regulations for CHRISTIANS. If I ain't CHRISTIAN, the regulations ain't for me.

They only people who have to figure out the Old/New Testament issue are HEBREWS that are also CHRISTIANS. If I ain't his type of person, why would I waste my time trying to figure it out?

You obviously have more time to waste than I do. But why would do you care so much? Why let this issue upset you enough that you've read all the regulations in the Old Testament and all the ones in the New Testament so they could be compared? Instead of wasting all that time on something you dislike, you could have been doing something fun: enjoying this great life that we all have. The time we have is too short to spend doing useless things.

If you believe religion is useless, stop wasting your time talking/writing about it; find useful/fun things to do that fill your life with joy. Ride a jetski or learn to crochet or fly a Cessna or ask the local library if they need people for a project (libraries are always doing useful long-term projects): you would *enjoy* one of these things more than you enjoy studying religion, so go do something you enjoy.

Yet we see many times in faith books written about them that this is often false and not very true.

We see that the so called absolute morals are actually often much more like relative morals relative to religion and time.

I think James Tracy is right.

God can change the rules whenever he wants to - and guess what? He HAS.

Old Testament: "an eye for an eye"
New Testament: "turn the other cheek"

Isn't this evidence that God's 'moral law' is not absolute (i.e. immutable)? Between Old and New testaments, there is a near-180 degree turn. Christians typically call this change a shift from the 'old covenant' to the 'new covenant'.

So which is it? It can't be both. Do we exact revenge, or turn the other cheek? Or are we to exact revenge WHILE turning the other cheek? How does this work, exactly?

Under the 'Old' covenant we were supposed to stone to death adulterers, homosexuals, witches, disobedient children, people collecting sticks on the Sabbath..etc. These were God's explicit orders back then. Now, according to God, it is considered to be explicitly wrong to stone people to death on account of these actions, as per the 'new' covenant. Apparently nowadays God doesn't mind people working on the Sabbath either. How come he CHANGED THE RULES?

All this variance... yet we are being asked to believe that this God's rules are immutable or unchanging? Get real.

To the questions:
1. Does this mean that God could exactly flip what was evil and what was good at whim, any time He wanted, as many times as He wanted, throughout the course of all time?
and
2. Could God flip what was good and what was evil without telling us humans?

You must be answering "no, God cannot do that."

My apologies, I thought you were in the camp that God could do anything He wanted with regards to defining morality.

By the way, Could gravity change without us knowing about it? Not in any substantial way.

I argue that the conception of evil that relies only on the whim of a creature who could reverse what is good and evil whenever he wants -- is arbitrary and potentially unstable. Especially if that creature has not supra-morality that he must conform to. Beyond that, figuring out what is good and evil in such a conception is impossible.